My Facebook Post:
I'm smarting with the good old-fashioned Old Testament Smack-Down I received at church this morning. Don't you just love it when they return to the message of judgement under the law of a righteous God and only footnote the solution in we receive from Christ. I'm left feeling like I should quit going to church and just go find my meth pipe again. Thank Jesus that He continues to love me regardless of me being me!
To quote another's post:
Kienan Mick(fb post)
Don't let your hate of 'sin' outgrow your love of redemption. In fact, don't let it grow at all. Because when you do:
Greed chokes off justice for the poor,
Apathy withers empathy for the sick,
Justification drowns compassion for the persecuted.
Love blossoms and grows. Judgment withers and rots.
So, what motivated all this? Today's message in church was drawn from Joshua 7. It describes how Isreal found themselves, once again, in disfavor with God after they had just been given victory over Jericho. One man steals some of the holy spoils against God's specific orders, and God pulls back his favor until justice upon this individual is poured out(in a brutal stoning of his entire household). The man's name is Achan. He is confronted(as is everyone), and admits he did it. His punishment is to stone his entire household and all his belongings and leave them buried under a pile of said stones. This is the righteous action of a just God for failure to obey. I get it! The message of the need to repent before you too get buried in God's wrath comes through loud and clear.
Here is where I start to falter. You see, I have an Achan in my heart! Besides being a great pun, it happens to be true. I too have been given a new life from God. I called on him in the midst of losing my children and my life and he "gave me the land"; I was set free and restored. After some time, I realized that I couldn't do the capital "C" Christian walk. I don't march in lock-step well with others, and I'm prone to pharisee-like behavior. I love being on the righteous side and pointing out your flaws and faults with loving condescension. I love imposing my views on others, for there own good. I'm really good at it. I have a feeling that given enough latitude(read power and control), I could really excel at getting confessions out of sinners and help dispatch then to God with clean consciences(but I digress). Thank God that he stopped my rise in the ranks of the church. Instead, I became uncomfortable with my new life. I began to listen to rock music and to drink and smoke(in moderation). I wandered from the fold. I took the holy life God had restored to me and began to spend it on myself. I keep asking Jesus what was wrong with me, and was always met with the answer that He knows me, He made me, He loves me, and everything is gonna be alright.
You see, I was taught that the Old Testament is a history book that teaches how the Law is insufficient to bring us into a relationship with God. It is a Good Law, it is a Just Law, but due to our very natures, it is never gonna bring us back into the fold. THAT"S WHY JESUS CAME AND SATISFIED THE LAW IN OUR PLACE!!!! I know that it is taught with the best of intentions, but to take us back to the Old Testament for lessons on how to live today just shows how screwed we are without Jesus. There's an Achan in all our hearts! That's why I put all my trust in God-Lite, Jesus Christ. Or more appropriately GOD-LIGHT):
John 8:12 "Then Jesus spoke again to them, saying, I am the Light of the world. He who follows Me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life."
Jesus came to make it all work out. He provided the way. He satisfied the Just Law with His own Sinless Life, because we cannot do it, ever. He is the gentler, easier way. All the "guilt trips", all the "stone the sinner in your midsts" couldn't get us to do it right. Love wins where guilt just condemns!
I'm left with this final thought: If the events that lead to the death of Achan and his household had happened when Jesus walked the earth, WWJD(What would Jesus do)? I'm sure it also would have something to do with stones, but likely a more merciful outcome.
Joh 8:1 But Jesus went to the Mount of Olives.
Joh 8:2 And early in the morning He came again into the temple, and all the people came to Him. And He sat down and taught them.
Joh 8:3 And the scribes and Pharisees brought to Him a woman taken in adultery. And standing her in the midst,
Joh 8:4 they said to Him, Teacher, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.
Joh 8:5 Now Moses in the Law commanded us that such should be stoned. You, then, what do you say?
Joh 8:6 They said this, tempting Him so that they might have reason to accuse Him. But bending down, Jesus wrote on the ground with His finger, not appearing to hear.
Joh 8:7 But as they continued to ask Him, He lifted Himself up and said to them, He who is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone at her.
Joh 8:8 And again bending down, He wrote on the ground.
Joh 8:9 And hearing, and being convicted by conscience, they went out one by one, beginning at the oldest, until the last. And Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.
Joh 8:10 And bending back up, and seeing no one but the woman, Jesus said to her, Woman, where are the ones who accused you? Did not one give judgment against you?
Joh 8:11 And she said, No one, Lord. And Jesus said to her, Neither do I give judgment. Go, and sin no more.
Joh 8:12 Then Jesus spoke again to them, saying, I am the Light of the world. He who follows Me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.
Sunday, March 11, 2012
Friday, March 2, 2012
Good Intentions Highway
I was at the Rock and Worship Roadshow last night in Boise when I was struck by an epiphany: Politicization/Legislation of Christianity in America may well be the biggest blunder to promoting the Gospel since the Inquisition.
I will say up front that my Faith has been all over the map. I can most likely be described currently as Christian-Left, but it's really more eclectic than that. My faith is in Christ and Christ alone and I do rely on His Grace; the rest I question daily. I have been following the news of the day with the Republican Primaries with great interest, as well as many of the laws being proposed on the state level with regards to abortion, contraceptives, and personhood. I am pro-life, but also pro-choice(on many issues, not just abortion), but that's another whole blog. To cut to the quick, I am likely to vote for President Obama this time, although I voted for McCain, last time. All that said, let me elaborate on my "epiphany" of last night.
I believe that the Gospel of Jesus Christ is something that is promoted on the heart level, not the political arena. It is a personal call to the individual, by God, through believers and other situations. If we become so boisterous as to insist that our view become everyone's view through legislation and the legal process, we alienate all those who hold different views. In a sense, we solidify their view that we are JAMES(Judgemental, arrogant, mean-spirited, egotistical, and self-rightious). We can not win over hearts and minds to the gospel of love by insisting that they follow it or we will lock them up.This also speaks to the fact that there are many interpretations of christian belief within our own camps. Who's interpretation becomes the approved one? It is a very slippery slope created with the best of intentions. God is already enthroned in the hearts of believers, to enforce it in the codes of a society that has people of many beliefs and creeds is to alienate all those with differing beliefs. There is a reason that the Founding Fathers made a point of not requiring/allowing any religious test for our elected officials. Further, they made laws that allowed religious freedom, not just protection for religion, but freedom FROM religion.
The christian-right may well win the vote, but in the process we will likely push those on the fence to the gospel into the opposing camp. People are not fond of being forced into anything. If that were the case, God could have simply taken away our free will and made us into worship-bots. He wants us to choose Him, of our own free will. That no longer becomes an option if we are legislated into being Christians, like-it-or-not!
Lets get back to loving all of God's children and letting God open the doors to hearts by being the people he has called us to be. As the song states: They will know we are christians by our love", not by our political agenda.
I will say up front that my Faith has been all over the map. I can most likely be described currently as Christian-Left, but it's really more eclectic than that. My faith is in Christ and Christ alone and I do rely on His Grace; the rest I question daily. I have been following the news of the day with the Republican Primaries with great interest, as well as many of the laws being proposed on the state level with regards to abortion, contraceptives, and personhood. I am pro-life, but also pro-choice(on many issues, not just abortion), but that's another whole blog. To cut to the quick, I am likely to vote for President Obama this time, although I voted for McCain, last time. All that said, let me elaborate on my "epiphany" of last night.
I believe that the Gospel of Jesus Christ is something that is promoted on the heart level, not the political arena. It is a personal call to the individual, by God, through believers and other situations. If we become so boisterous as to insist that our view become everyone's view through legislation and the legal process, we alienate all those who hold different views. In a sense, we solidify their view that we are JAMES(Judgemental, arrogant, mean-spirited, egotistical, and self-rightious). We can not win over hearts and minds to the gospel of love by insisting that they follow it or we will lock them up.This also speaks to the fact that there are many interpretations of christian belief within our own camps. Who's interpretation becomes the approved one? It is a very slippery slope created with the best of intentions. God is already enthroned in the hearts of believers, to enforce it in the codes of a society that has people of many beliefs and creeds is to alienate all those with differing beliefs. There is a reason that the Founding Fathers made a point of not requiring/allowing any religious test for our elected officials. Further, they made laws that allowed religious freedom, not just protection for religion, but freedom FROM religion.
The christian-right may well win the vote, but in the process we will likely push those on the fence to the gospel into the opposing camp. People are not fond of being forced into anything. If that were the case, God could have simply taken away our free will and made us into worship-bots. He wants us to choose Him, of our own free will. That no longer becomes an option if we are legislated into being Christians, like-it-or-not!
Lets get back to loving all of God's children and letting God open the doors to hearts by being the people he has called us to be. As the song states: They will know we are christians by our love", not by our political agenda.
Friday, December 16, 2011
Learning (Earning) Respect
Wow, it's been a long time since I posted. I have been going through a lot of changes, and yet I have kept quiet since last May. I figure it is likely that I have been living with some fear that my thoughts may expose too much of my true feelings and I don't want to alarm anyone with pendulum swinging thoughts until they settle a bit. In a nut shell, I have returned to my liberal-leaning view of life while retaining my firm belief in a loving Creator and His plan for loving All his creation through the sacrifice of Christ. That being said, I am working through several issues that don't fit comfortably into the box. Frankly, I question several tenets of mainstream Christianity. I question the absolute voracity of Scripture, as I know how man likes to manipulate and alter things to reinforce the view the group in power wants to promote. I also have a real hard time with lines that tell me to disregard my own feelings and perceptions and just do as I'm told. I've never been good at blindly accepting anything. Does this mean that I don't believe God's Word? No, rather that I believe God gave me a brain ( and yes even this wicked heart)to use to work through these thoughts. I reject that every errant and stray thought "breaks God's heart". He knows me. He made me. Nothing I do, say, or think comes as a surprise to God.
So much for the preface.
I have come to accept and support the diversity of Creation. I currently feel that it's OK to allow others to believe and live as they choose; i.e. to offer respect to a wide variety of beliefs and lifestyles. I don't care if your Muslim, Atheist, Polytheist, or Mormon. I am called to love you all without reservation. I don't care if you want to live your life with someone of your own sex and share in the joys and sorrows of marriage. I am called to love you unconditionally; without reservation. I don't care if you drink, smoke, burp, or like to eat fried grasshoppers. Do you do it responsibly without harming those around you? More power to you. Life is hard enough without me telling you that you are going to Hell for believing differently than me.
You see, I have seen and observed throughout history that any group can, and has, abused their fellow man in the "name of(fill in the blank)". If your reason for being cruel and unloving towards your fellow man is your own righteous belief system, something is wrong. So, I have chosen to follow what I feel is the heart of God: to love one another. You see, I didn't find God, He found me. And oddly enough, despite my various side trips in life, He continues to draw me. Not though condemnation, but though patience and love.
So whoever you are, I support, accept and love you to the best of my current ability; which is not always so noble, as I am a human and prone to being a bit of a jerk at times. I am learning though. I feel more inclined to come to your defense than to put you down these days. This is the respect that my blog title alludes to.
So now for the inciting incident that got these juices flowing enough to blog: I recently had a friend, that I used to discuss Christianity with(he was a professed Christian), get excited about an article in the paper that Atheists had taken over a city park for Christmas and had put up several displays to mock Christian beliefs. The disturbing thing was that he was joining in the mocking. Apparently his beliefs have so changed that he now hates Christians. I was hurt, and concerned for his soul, etc. Then I got the epiphany that this is how so many others have felt for so long as we Christians insult and mock them for there different views. In mocking another there is no love for others only love for self. I could just hear the argument that, "turn around is fair play", but a little louder I heard, "two wrongs don't make a right". It just confirmed my viewpoint that heavy-handed insistence that others adopt my beliefs is wrong, no matter who is saying it. The nice thing is that, unlike before, I felt that I didn't need to come to God's defense. It's OK if today my friend wants to question the reality of God. He doesn't need to believe in God, God still believes in him. And allowed enough space to pursue his own understanding, he to will likely run into God in his own powerful way. Or not! It's not my call. My call is to love him anyway, and yes, even offer him the respect that I so eagerly want extended to me.
"Today God, Please keep me humble. Let me come to the aid of those persecuted for their beliefs, even if they differ from my own. Let me be counted amonst those who put love of others above love of self(or love of being right). let me lighten the load of the oppressed instead of adding to it. Thank you for letting me live with the assurance that in the end, Love Wins. Amen"
So much for the preface.
I have come to accept and support the diversity of Creation. I currently feel that it's OK to allow others to believe and live as they choose; i.e. to offer respect to a wide variety of beliefs and lifestyles. I don't care if your Muslim, Atheist, Polytheist, or Mormon. I am called to love you all without reservation. I don't care if you want to live your life with someone of your own sex and share in the joys and sorrows of marriage. I am called to love you unconditionally; without reservation. I don't care if you drink, smoke, burp, or like to eat fried grasshoppers. Do you do it responsibly without harming those around you? More power to you. Life is hard enough without me telling you that you are going to Hell for believing differently than me.
You see, I have seen and observed throughout history that any group can, and has, abused their fellow man in the "name of(fill in the blank)". If your reason for being cruel and unloving towards your fellow man is your own righteous belief system, something is wrong. So, I have chosen to follow what I feel is the heart of God: to love one another. You see, I didn't find God, He found me. And oddly enough, despite my various side trips in life, He continues to draw me. Not though condemnation, but though patience and love.
So whoever you are, I support, accept and love you to the best of my current ability; which is not always so noble, as I am a human and prone to being a bit of a jerk at times. I am learning though. I feel more inclined to come to your defense than to put you down these days. This is the respect that my blog title alludes to.
So now for the inciting incident that got these juices flowing enough to blog: I recently had a friend, that I used to discuss Christianity with(he was a professed Christian), get excited about an article in the paper that Atheists had taken over a city park for Christmas and had put up several displays to mock Christian beliefs. The disturbing thing was that he was joining in the mocking. Apparently his beliefs have so changed that he now hates Christians. I was hurt, and concerned for his soul, etc. Then I got the epiphany that this is how so many others have felt for so long as we Christians insult and mock them for there different views. In mocking another there is no love for others only love for self. I could just hear the argument that, "turn around is fair play", but a little louder I heard, "two wrongs don't make a right". It just confirmed my viewpoint that heavy-handed insistence that others adopt my beliefs is wrong, no matter who is saying it. The nice thing is that, unlike before, I felt that I didn't need to come to God's defense. It's OK if today my friend wants to question the reality of God. He doesn't need to believe in God, God still believes in him. And allowed enough space to pursue his own understanding, he to will likely run into God in his own powerful way. Or not! It's not my call. My call is to love him anyway, and yes, even offer him the respect that I so eagerly want extended to me.
"Today God, Please keep me humble. Let me come to the aid of those persecuted for their beliefs, even if they differ from my own. Let me be counted amonst those who put love of others above love of self(or love of being right). let me lighten the load of the oppressed instead of adding to it. Thank you for letting me live with the assurance that in the end, Love Wins. Amen"
Saturday, May 14, 2011
It's Lonely out in Space....
"Captain, we're running out of power"I had my 46th birthday in Las Vegas, yesterday! I made the trip down, across the desert with my three young children in a '78 Toyota Motorhome. The trip was fun, but once we hit Vegas, I just couldn't get my wind up. I enjoyed a nice time with my Father for a late lunch and then joined up with additional family(Brother Garth,Niece Jessica, Nephew Gabriel and his wife Therese, and My Step-Mother Barbara) for an early dinner. Then off to a friends house to settle kids and contemplate my Milestone in Sin City(My Hometown, actually). So many options, So many memories! I have thrown Toga Parties, Huge Keggers, I've chased my share of thrills and adventures. My Birthday is a reason to CELEBRATE!!!!
In the end, I laid down feeling old, tired, and blue.
I debated the options and found that I was enjoying having someone else keep my kids busy while I enjoyed some peace.I didn't feel like taking my motorhome to the casino and figured I'd rather have that hundred bucks in my pocket in the morning than donate it to the casino.
I used to celebrate things like this with my brother, but he isn't talking to me right now. Life goes on. I did get a call from a long-lost, recently-found friend who happened to remember that May 13th was special for some reason, and thought it might be my Birthday(no FB notice). I also received about 50 "Happy Birthday's" from my FB family. Always appreciated! I got a camera from Dad, and help for the trip from Mom. I got cupcakes from Felicia(with help from the girls)
Best of all, I got flowers and cards and kisses and the birthday song about 4 times from my very lovely daughters. I also got some rest(much needed, I guess).
I want to bemoan the lack of dancing girls(who all want to bed me), the Power Powders that used to make me feel like a Rock Star, and the Party that featured my favorite bands playing tribute to my birth. But this year, Sex, Drugs, and Rock-n-Roll took a pass. They had prior obligations! Or maybe they were right where they always are, and I just never showed! Pretty lame effort for a birthday bash in Vegas!
I will say that Vegas for me isn't Vegas for most others. It is my hometown and is more akin to memories past than the "VEGAS, BABY" most think of. This is the town of ghosts for me. Hotels no longer standing, rights of passage long past. Favorite spots now changed forever.
Am I done? Am I past my prime? Is that all she wrote? I tend to think that this must be Half-time. I have finally landed smach dab in the middle of Middle-age. It was a time to reflect, relax, regroup, and with a pep-talk from the coach get ready to re-emerge out of the locker-room and take the field for the second half of the game. I don't care what the scoreboard says. I'm gonna give it my all and see this game through to the end like a champion.
So Happy Birthday to Me! Thanks to all the well-wishers. And thank God for benching me during the last play of the first half. I have a feeling I was getting ready to hurt myself.
Now, Let's play ball!!!!!!
In the end, I laid down feeling old, tired, and blue.
I debated the options and found that I was enjoying having someone else keep my kids busy while I enjoyed some peace.I didn't feel like taking my motorhome to the casino and figured I'd rather have that hundred bucks in my pocket in the morning than donate it to the casino.
I used to celebrate things like this with my brother, but he isn't talking to me right now. Life goes on. I did get a call from a long-lost, recently-found friend who happened to remember that May 13th was special for some reason, and thought it might be my Birthday(no FB notice). I also received about 50 "Happy Birthday's" from my FB family. Always appreciated! I got a camera from Dad, and help for the trip from Mom. I got cupcakes from Felicia(with help from the girls)
Best of all, I got flowers and cards and kisses and the birthday song about 4 times from my very lovely daughters. I also got some rest(much needed, I guess).
I want to bemoan the lack of dancing girls(who all want to bed me), the Power Powders that used to make me feel like a Rock Star, and the Party that featured my favorite bands playing tribute to my birth. But this year, Sex, Drugs, and Rock-n-Roll took a pass. They had prior obligations! Or maybe they were right where they always are, and I just never showed! Pretty lame effort for a birthday bash in Vegas!
I will say that Vegas for me isn't Vegas for most others. It is my hometown and is more akin to memories past than the "VEGAS, BABY" most think of. This is the town of ghosts for me. Hotels no longer standing, rights of passage long past. Favorite spots now changed forever.
Am I done? Am I past my prime? Is that all she wrote? I tend to think that this must be Half-time. I have finally landed smach dab in the middle of Middle-age. It was a time to reflect, relax, regroup, and with a pep-talk from the coach get ready to re-emerge out of the locker-room and take the field for the second half of the game. I don't care what the scoreboard says. I'm gonna give it my all and see this game through to the end like a champion.
So Happy Birthday to Me! Thanks to all the well-wishers. And thank God for benching me during the last play of the first half. I have a feeling I was getting ready to hurt myself.
Now, Let's play ball!!!!!!
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
Open Letter to an Atheist/Reposted
Open Letter to an Atheist
God Is Love.
Take any argument that uses God as a subject and replace it with the word love. Love cannot be proven. Love is responsible for passions in men that go beyond logic. I would argue that love is not the reason for wars , and other atrocities, but then again self love-ie pride-is. That results from considering our selves, God.
So why God? Order! You see, everything has order. Even the randomness of chaos appears to operate in a playing field of order. Who says that God had to provide this order? He did, for one. Many brilliant and educated minds have sought out truth and come to the same conclusion. It appears so easy to label those who have come to conclusion that there is some form of intelligence behind the order in the universe as brainwashed morons believing in superstition (or please insert any derogatory statement that reduces the debate to namecalling) and those who hold a different opinion as “freethinkers(etc,), that it's difficult to wish to enter the discussion. But having done so I will put forth a few points to “freely think” about.
Why Order? What is it that makes any of it work? I became convinced of the existence of God during my 9th grade biology class. We were studying skin cells. And the complexity of how a single cell manages to operate is spectacular. Now I can agree that we have come to understand how these things operate, but not why. At every level we find a complexity of order that is beyond our ability to create.
But we create all kinds of stuff, you say. I would put forth that we assemble/rearrange/build a great deal, but that man has yet to create a single thing. All matter that was, is. Even the birth process of our own people is a series of seemingly near impossible events that must take place in perfect sequence for a new person to emerge. We can manipulate it, but we cannot create it. Do you really believe that random chaos is is conducive to life? It works for destruction(something we are pretty good at), but not so good in creation.
Why morality? What leads us to believe that there is any truth whatsoever? I mean if truth is relative, than my truth is your false, and Hitler or Dalmer was no more right or wrong than Ghandi or Mother Theresa. An easy one to shout out a “yes, that's right”, to, but think about it. If there is no right and wrong( universal truth) than the whole argument is moot. There is no logic. No ability to discern, we break down into randomness and chaos. A=B will not work because I can assert that my truth is to counter yours and we are left with namecalling and chaos. So we simply agree that killing small children to make tacos is socially unacceptable, at this time( some would call this a social contract). I don't know about you, but I have a real sense that killing small children is wrong. I also get a strong conviction that helping someone who is in an auto accident is right. I call it morality, but I suspect it borders on truth. Why do we have any sense of right and wrong if we are nothing but evolved monkeys? What is it about us that even let's us develop the ability to codify Logic(which oddly enough is based on the concept that things are true or false)?
Why Beauty? While I recognize that this is a largely subjective concept, I do put forth that the mere concept of beauty is in contradiction to the “evolved monkey” concept. We are the only creature that even appears to have any concept of appreciating beauty. We sing about it, write about it, focus on the search for it, and yes, we find it. Although our individual definitions vary we all find beauty in the things in our world, even if that beauty is something like a well executed play on a football field or a well finessed debate in the boardroom, instead of a painting by Da Vinci, a symphony by Mozart, or the smile on your childs face. Or even a sunset, a flower or a single skin cell. Beauty is all around us, and though you can coldly say it is only in the eye of the beholder, it does exist, despite insisting that it really doesn't. A world without beauty would be a pretty bleak place, one without order, one without truth, one without love, one without God.
But we don't live in that world...Do we???
Remember, God is Love
God Is Love.
Take any argument that uses God as a subject and replace it with the word love. Love cannot be proven. Love is responsible for passions in men that go beyond logic. I would argue that love is not the reason for wars , and other atrocities, but then again self love-ie pride-is. That results from considering our selves, God.
So why God? Order! You see, everything has order. Even the randomness of chaos appears to operate in a playing field of order. Who says that God had to provide this order? He did, for one. Many brilliant and educated minds have sought out truth and come to the same conclusion. It appears so easy to label those who have come to conclusion that there is some form of intelligence behind the order in the universe as brainwashed morons believing in superstition (or please insert any derogatory statement that reduces the debate to namecalling) and those who hold a different opinion as “freethinkers(etc,), that it's difficult to wish to enter the discussion. But having done so I will put forth a few points to “freely think” about.
Why Order? What is it that makes any of it work? I became convinced of the existence of God during my 9th grade biology class. We were studying skin cells. And the complexity of how a single cell manages to operate is spectacular. Now I can agree that we have come to understand how these things operate, but not why. At every level we find a complexity of order that is beyond our ability to create.
But we create all kinds of stuff, you say. I would put forth that we assemble/rearrange/build a great deal, but that man has yet to create a single thing. All matter that was, is. Even the birth process of our own people is a series of seemingly near impossible events that must take place in perfect sequence for a new person to emerge. We can manipulate it, but we cannot create it. Do you really believe that random chaos is is conducive to life? It works for destruction(something we are pretty good at), but not so good in creation.
Why morality? What leads us to believe that there is any truth whatsoever? I mean if truth is relative, than my truth is your false, and Hitler or Dalmer was no more right or wrong than Ghandi or Mother Theresa. An easy one to shout out a “yes, that's right”, to, but think about it. If there is no right and wrong( universal truth) than the whole argument is moot. There is no logic. No ability to discern, we break down into randomness and chaos. A=B will not work because I can assert that my truth is to counter yours and we are left with namecalling and chaos. So we simply agree that killing small children to make tacos is socially unacceptable, at this time( some would call this a social contract). I don't know about you, but I have a real sense that killing small children is wrong. I also get a strong conviction that helping someone who is in an auto accident is right. I call it morality, but I suspect it borders on truth. Why do we have any sense of right and wrong if we are nothing but evolved monkeys? What is it about us that even let's us develop the ability to codify Logic(which oddly enough is based on the concept that things are true or false)?
Why Beauty? While I recognize that this is a largely subjective concept, I do put forth that the mere concept of beauty is in contradiction to the “evolved monkey” concept. We are the only creature that even appears to have any concept of appreciating beauty. We sing about it, write about it, focus on the search for it, and yes, we find it. Although our individual definitions vary we all find beauty in the things in our world, even if that beauty is something like a well executed play on a football field or a well finessed debate in the boardroom, instead of a painting by Da Vinci, a symphony by Mozart, or the smile on your childs face. Or even a sunset, a flower or a single skin cell. Beauty is all around us, and though you can coldly say it is only in the eye of the beholder, it does exist, despite insisting that it really doesn't. A world without beauty would be a pretty bleak place, one without order, one without truth, one without love, one without God.
But we don't live in that world...Do we???
Remember, God is Love
Saturday, October 2, 2010
"Boundary of the Known" or "Friends pt.2"
I met someone on Facebook today and enjoyed a brief back-and-forth conversation on like-minded subjects. After a bit, I sent a friend request and got back a reply that thy only become Facebook friends with those they know face-to-face. I relied that this was NP(no problem). I put it out of my mind(so I thought). Later, while surfing around, it came back to me, with questions(as is usually the case, with "curious thoughts"). It went something like this:
I couldn't help my wandering mind and I was thinking about your "boundary" of only facebooking with known friends. It stuck me first, that, "doesn't that basically defeat the purpose of it?" I mean, we already know how to connect with people we know. Ok, so then it's like a glorified communication system (i.e. New Phone). Frankly, I must admit that I have mostly connected with "people I know in person", too. Except for a couple of notable exceptions.
My first real on-line friend is a girl from Latvia named Anastasia. She has known me through my drug addicted, sexually charged late night ramblings, when I first met her on-line. She always composed herself as a lady, and a friend despite some of my less-appropriate postings. We have remained friends-t-a-distance through many life changes. She is now a nurse in England and travels extensively.
Next, I have made friendships with people like Anne Rice, whom I never would have known otherwise. We may never meet vis-a-vis, but I consider her my friend and have communicated with her.
Also, I have made a few "friends" through fellow commentors at a known-friends postings. There is something about seeing another acquaintance of a friend share thoughts that you either embrace or you reject and then enjoy a dialog on these and other issues. It's like seeing someone at a house party and being drawn to meet them.
I can truly say that I look forward to making new friends on on-line. I don't know that I'll jump up and befriend a group of random profiles, but I will make an effort to look for new friends where I can. I mean, everyone is a stranger until they become a friend. And anyway, I can use all the friends I can get! Who knows, I might even meet them in person one day, but by then we won't be strangers anymore. Just old friends who get their first embrace.
Thank you to all those around the world who "Boldly Go" into Cyberspace to make connections and establish friendships. Love thy Neighbor! YEAH!!!!!!
Peace, Jonny
I couldn't help my wandering mind and I was thinking about your "boundary" of only facebooking with known friends. It stuck me first, that, "doesn't that basically defeat the purpose of it?" I mean, we already know how to connect with people we know. Ok, so then it's like a glorified communication system (i.e. New Phone). Frankly, I must admit that I have mostly connected with "people I know in person", too. Except for a couple of notable exceptions.
My first real on-line friend is a girl from Latvia named Anastasia. She has known me through my drug addicted, sexually charged late night ramblings, when I first met her on-line. She always composed herself as a lady, and a friend despite some of my less-appropriate postings. We have remained friends-t-a-distance through many life changes. She is now a nurse in England and travels extensively.
Next, I have made friendships with people like Anne Rice, whom I never would have known otherwise. We may never meet vis-a-vis, but I consider her my friend and have communicated with her.
Also, I have made a few "friends" through fellow commentors at a known-friends postings. There is something about seeing another acquaintance of a friend share thoughts that you either embrace or you reject and then enjoy a dialog on these and other issues. It's like seeing someone at a house party and being drawn to meet them.
I can truly say that I look forward to making new friends on on-line. I don't know that I'll jump up and befriend a group of random profiles, but I will make an effort to look for new friends where I can. I mean, everyone is a stranger until they become a friend. And anyway, I can use all the friends I can get! Who knows, I might even meet them in person one day, but by then we won't be strangers anymore. Just old friends who get their first embrace.
Thank you to all those around the world who "Boldly Go" into Cyberspace to make connections and establish friendships. Love thy Neighbor! YEAH!!!!!!
Peace, Jonny
A day in a class of Apologetics
I was recently perusing the comment stream of a friend of mine who has embarked on a journey away from organized Christianity while still claiming to embrace Christ. I have followed her musings and posts with interest, as there are many things that she has rallied against that also strike a chord with me and my own journey. Recently she posted a comment that while sounding smart seemed to overly simplistic. The post was as follows:
Subject: God VS Science
'Let me explain the problem science has with religion. 'The atheist professor of philosophy pause...s before his class and then asks one of his new students to stand.
'You're a Christian, aren't you, son?'
'Yes sir, 'the student says.
'So you believe in God?'
'Absolutely.'
Is God good?'
'Sure! God's good.'
'Is God all-powerful? Can God do anything?'
'Yes'
'Are you good or evil?'
'The Bible says I'm evil.'
The professor grins knowingly. 'Aha! The Bible!’ He considers for a moment. 'Here's one for you. Let's say there's a sick person over here and you can cure him. You can do it. Would you help him? Would you try?'
'Yes sir, I would.'
'So you're good...!'
'I wouldn't say that.'
'But why not say that? You'd help a sick and maimed person if you could. Most of us would if we could. But God doesn't.'
The student does not answer, so the professor continues. 'He doesn't, does he? My brother was a Christian who died of cancer, even though he prayed to Jesus to heal him. How is this Jesus good? Can you answer that one?'
The student remains silent. 'No, you can't, can you?' the professor says. He takes a sip of water from a glass on his desk to give the student time to relax. 'Let's start again, young fella. Is God good?'
'Er..yes,' the student says.
'Is Satan good?'
The student doesn't hesitate on this one. 'No.'
'Then where does Satan come from?'
The student falters. 'From God'
'That's right. God made Satan, didn't he? Tell me, son. Is there evil in this world?'
'Yes, sir..'
'Evil's everywhere, isn't it? And God did make everything, correct?'
'Yes'
'So who created evil?' The professor continued, 'If God created everything, then God created evil, since evil exists, and according to the principle that our works define who we are, then God is evil.'
Again, the student has no answer. 'Is there sickness? Immorality? Hatred? Ugliness? All these terrible things, do they exist in this world?'
The student squirms on his feet. 'Yes.'
'So who created them?'
The student does not answer again, so the professor repeats his question. 'Who created them?' There is still no answer. Suddenly the lecturer breaks away to pace in front of the classroom. The class is mesmerized. 'Tell me,' he continues onto another student. 'Do you believe in Jesus Christ, son?'
The student's voice betrays him and cracks. 'Yes, professor, I do.'
The old man stops pacing. 'Science says you have five senses you use to identify and observe the world around you. Have you ever seen Jesus?'
'No sir. I've never seen Him.'
'Then tell us if you've ever heard your Jesus?'
'No, sir, I have not..'
'Have you ever felt your Jesus, tasted your Jesus or smelt your Jesus? Have you ever had any sensory perception of Jesus Christ, or God for that matter?'
'No, sir, I'm afraid I haven't.'
'Yet you still believe in him?'
'Yes'
'According to the rules of empirical, testable, demonstrable protocol, science says your God doesn't exist... What do you say to that, son?'
'Nothing,' the student replies.. 'I only have my faith.'
'Yes, faith,' the professor repeats. 'And that is the problem science has with God. There is no evidence, only faith.'
The student stands quietly for a moment, before asking a question of His own. 'Professor, is there such thing as heat?'
'Yes. ’
'And is there such a thing as cold?'
'Yes, son, there's cold too.'
'No sir, there isn't.'
The professor turns to face the student, obviously interested. The room suddenly becomes very quiet. The student begins to explain. 'You can have lots of heat, even more heat, super-heat, mega-heat, unlimited heat, white heat, a little heat or no heat, but we don't have anything called 'cold'. We can hit down to 458 degrees below zero, which is no heat, but we can't go any further after that. There is no such thing as cold; otherwise we would be able to go colder than the lowest -458 degrees. Every body or object is susceptible to study when it has or transmits energy, and heat is what makes a body or matter have or transmit energy. Absolute zero (-458 F) is the total absence of heat. You see, sir, cold is only a word we use to describe the absence of heat. We cannot measure cold. Heat we can measure in thermal units because heat is energy. Cold is not the opposite of heat, sir, just the absence of it.'
Silence across the room. A pen drops somewhere in the classroom, sounding like a hammer.
'What about darkness, professor. Is there such a thing as darkness?'
'Yes,' the professor replies without hesitation.. 'What is night if it isn't darkness?'
'You're wrong again, sir. Darkness is not something; it is the absence of something. You can have low light, normal light, bright light, flashing light, but if you have no light constantly you have nothing and it's called darkness, isn't it? That's the meaning we use to define the word. In reality, darkness isn't. If it were, you would be able to make darkness darker, wouldn't you?'
The professor begins to smile at the student in front of him. This will be a good semester. 'So what point are you making, young man?'
'Yes, professor. My point is, your philosophical premise is flawed to start with, and so your conclusion must also be flawed.'
The professor's face cannot hide his surprise this time. 'Flawed? Can you explain how?'
'You are working on the premise of duality,' the student explains... 'You argue that there is life and then there's death; a good God and a bad God. You are viewing the concept of God as something finite, something we can measure. Sir, science can't even explain a thought.' 'It uses electricity and magnetism, but has never seen, much less fully understood either one. To view death as the opposite of life is to be ignorant of the fact that death cannot exist as a substantive thing. Death is not the opposite of life, just the absence of it.' '
'If you are referring to the natural evolutionary process, young man, yes, of course I do.'
'Have you ever observed evolution with your own eyes, sir?'
Th...e professor begins to shake his head, still smiling, as he realizes where the argument is going. A very good semester, indeed.
'Since no one has ever observed the process of evolution at work and cannot even prove that this process is an on-going endeavor, are you not teaching your opinion, sir? Are you now not a scientist, but a preacher?'
The class is in uproar.
Now the room is silent. The professor just stares at the student, his face unreadable.
'Now, you accept that there is faith, and, in fact, faith exists with life,' the student continues. 'Now, sir, is there such a thing as evil?'
To this the student replied, 'Evil does not exist sir, or at least it does not exist unto itself. Evil is simply the absence of God. It is just like darkness and cold, a word that man has created to describe the absence of God. God did not create evil. Evil is the result of what happens when man does not have God's love present in his heart. It's like the cold that comes when there is no heat or the darkness that comes when there is no light.'
The professor sat down. ..
Jan Darlene Hastings posted this quote below: "Morality is doing what is right no matter what you are told. Religion is doing what you are told no matter what is right. "
I read the comment stream with interest and found that the majority of the posters, including my friend who posted it, felt that it was brilliant and on the mark. I felt the need to counter with the following:
Do we have a sin nature? Do we need a Savior? If we are so capable of "Choosing the Right/Moral" why do so many "honorable" people so often get exposed for their secret moral flaws? Oh and those that say "no" to the above questions: are tra...its such as Hubris, Denial of flaws, superiority complex, etc. moral?
Relative truth is not truth, just as relative morality is not truly moral, for in some tribes it's moral to eat your captives, and yet to honor that morality would be to sanction murder.
Lastly, If we just "know" the difference between right and wrong, who gave us this knowledge? In this sense I could reconstruct the statement to be "religion is doing what is morally right, no matter what you are told", but that too would fall short, as religion is mans attempt to understand God. Yet in the attempt we gain wisdom and perspective and move closer to an absolute that teaches us to be moral. Without it we are blind men struggling in the dark to describe the elephant before us.
(apologetics borrowed from C.S. Lewis-Mere Christianity) Peace
Relative truth is not truth, just as relative morality is not truly moral, for in some tribes it's moral to eat your captives, and yet to honor that morality would be to sanction murder.
Lastly, If we just "know" the difference between right and wrong, who gave us this knowledge? In this sense I could reconstruct the statement to be "religion is doing what is morally right, no matter what you are told", but that too would fall short, as religion is mans attempt to understand God. Yet in the attempt we gain wisdom and perspective and move closer to an absolute that teaches us to be moral. Without it we are blind men struggling in the dark to describe the elephant before us.
(apologetics borrowed from C.S. Lewis-Mere Christianity) Peace
Today, someone "liked" my response and then proceeded to post the following three comments. I felt that they were so "Brilliant" and "On the Mark", that I felt the need to post them here on my blog for others to consider. I contacted the poster and was informed that the "School" posts were from a forwarded email. The other thoughts are her own. Thank you Angela Adams for these "pearls". Here they are:
Subject: God VS Science
'Let me explain the problem science has with religion. 'The atheist professor of philosophy pause...s before his class and then asks one of his new students to stand.
'You're a Christian, aren't you, son?'
'Yes sir, 'the student says.
'So you believe in God?'
'Absolutely.'
Is God good?'
'Sure! God's good.'
'Is God all-powerful? Can God do anything?'
'Yes'
'Are you good or evil?'
'The Bible says I'm evil.'
The professor grins knowingly. 'Aha! The Bible!’ He considers for a moment. 'Here's one for you. Let's say there's a sick person over here and you can cure him. You can do it. Would you help him? Would you try?'
'Yes sir, I would.'
'So you're good...!'
'I wouldn't say that.'
'But why not say that? You'd help a sick and maimed person if you could. Most of us would if we could. But God doesn't.'
The student does not answer, so the professor continues. 'He doesn't, does he? My brother was a Christian who died of cancer, even though he prayed to Jesus to heal him. How is this Jesus good? Can you answer that one?'
The student remains silent. 'No, you can't, can you?' the professor says. He takes a sip of water from a glass on his desk to give the student time to relax. 'Let's start again, young fella. Is God good?'
'Er..yes,' the student says.
'Is Satan good?'
The student doesn't hesitate on this one. 'No.'
'Then where does Satan come from?'
The student falters. 'From God'
'That's right. God made Satan, didn't he? Tell me, son. Is there evil in this world?'
'Yes, sir..'
'Evil's everywhere, isn't it? And God did make everything, correct?'
'Yes'
'So who created evil?' The professor continued, 'If God created everything, then God created evil, since evil exists, and according to the principle that our works define who we are, then God is evil.'
Again, the student has no answer. 'Is there sickness? Immorality? Hatred? Ugliness? All these terrible things, do they exist in this world?'
The student squirms on his feet. 'Yes.'
'So who created them?'
The student does not answer again, so the professor repeats his question. 'Who created them?' There is still no answer. Suddenly the lecturer breaks away to pace in front of the classroom. The class is mesmerized. 'Tell me,' he continues onto another student. 'Do you believe in Jesus Christ, son?'
The student's voice betrays him and cracks. 'Yes, professor, I do.'
The old man stops pacing. 'Science says you have five senses you use to identify and observe the world around you. Have you ever seen Jesus?'
'No sir. I've never seen Him.'
'Then tell us if you've ever heard your Jesus?'
'No, sir, I have not..'
'Have you ever felt your Jesus, tasted your Jesus or smelt your Jesus? Have you ever had any sensory perception of Jesus Christ, or God for that matter?'
'No, sir, I'm afraid I haven't.'
'Yet you still believe in him?'
'Yes'
'According to the rules of empirical, testable, demonstrable protocol, science says your God doesn't exist... What do you say to that, son?'
'Nothing,' the student replies.. 'I only have my faith.'
'Yes, faith,' the professor repeats. 'And that is the problem science has with God. There is no evidence, only faith.'
The student stands quietly for a moment, before asking a question of His own. 'Professor, is there such thing as heat?'
'Yes. ’
'And is there such a thing as cold?'
'Yes, son, there's cold too.'
'No sir, there isn't.'
The professor turns to face the student, obviously interested. The room suddenly becomes very quiet. The student begins to explain. 'You can have lots of heat, even more heat, super-heat, mega-heat, unlimited heat, white heat, a little heat or no heat, but we don't have anything called 'cold'. We can hit down to 458 degrees below zero, which is no heat, but we can't go any further after that. There is no such thing as cold; otherwise we would be able to go colder than the lowest -458 degrees. Every body or object is susceptible to study when it has or transmits energy, and heat is what makes a body or matter have or transmit energy. Absolute zero (-458 F) is the total absence of heat. You see, sir, cold is only a word we use to describe the absence of heat. We cannot measure cold. Heat we can measure in thermal units because heat is energy. Cold is not the opposite of heat, sir, just the absence of it.'
Silence across the room. A pen drops somewhere in the classroom, sounding like a hammer.
'What about darkness, professor. Is there such a thing as darkness?'
'Yes,' the professor replies without hesitation.. 'What is night if it isn't darkness?'
'You're wrong again, sir. Darkness is not something; it is the absence of something. You can have low light, normal light, bright light, flashing light, but if you have no light constantly you have nothing and it's called darkness, isn't it? That's the meaning we use to define the word. In reality, darkness isn't. If it were, you would be able to make darkness darker, wouldn't you?'
The professor begins to smile at the student in front of him. This will be a good semester. 'So what point are you making, young man?'
'Yes, professor. My point is, your philosophical premise is flawed to start with, and so your conclusion must also be flawed.'
The professor's face cannot hide his surprise this time. 'Flawed? Can you explain how?'
'You are working on the premise of duality,' the student explains... 'You argue that there is life and then there's death; a good God and a bad God. You are viewing the concept of God as something finite, something we can measure. Sir, science can't even explain a thought.' 'It uses electricity and magnetism, but has never seen, much less fully understood either one. To view death as the opposite of life is to be ignorant of the fact that death cannot exist as a substantive thing. Death is not the opposite of life, just the absence of it.' '
Now tell me, professor.. Do you teach your students that they evolved from a monkey?'
'If you are referring to the natural evolutionary process, young man, yes, of course I do.'
'Have you ever observed evolution with your own eyes, sir?'
Th...e professor begins to shake his head, still smiling, as he realizes where the argument is going. A very good semester, indeed.
'Since no one has ever observed the process of evolution at work and cannot even prove that this process is an on-going endeavor, are you not teaching your opinion, sir? Are you now not a scientist, but a preacher?'
The class is in uproar.
The student remains silent until the commotion has subsided.
'To continue the point you were making earlier to the other student, let me give you an example of what I mean..' The student looks around the room. 'Is there anyone in the class who has ever seen the professor's brain?'
The class breaks out into laughter.
'Is there anyone here who has ever heard the professor's brain, felt the professor's brain, touched or smelt the professor's brain? No one appears to have done so. So, according to the established rules of empirical, stable, demonstrable protocol, science says that you have no brain, with all due respect, sir.' 'So if science says you have no brain, how can we trust your lectures, sir?'
Now the room is silent. The professor just stares at the student, his face unreadable.
Finally, after what seems an eternity, the old man answers. 'I Guess you'll have to take them on faith.'
'Now, you accept that there is faith, and, in fact, faith exists with life,' the student continues. 'Now, sir, is there such a thing as evil?'
Now uncertain, the professor responds, 'Of course, there is. We see it Everyday. It is in the daily example of man's inhumanity to man. It is in The multitude of crime and violence everywhere in the world. These manifestations are nothing else but evil.'
To this the student replied, 'Evil does not exist sir, or at least it does not exist unto itself. Evil is simply the absence of God. It is just like darkness and cold, a word that man has created to describe the absence of God. God did not create evil. Evil is the result of what happens when man does not have God's love present in his heart. It's like the cold that comes when there is no heat or the darkness that comes when there is no light.'
The professor sat down. ..
(Forwarded email posted on Facebook.Author unknown)
What a great dialogue. I love good apologetics. And finally the post from Angela Adams that offers her own insights. Here it is:
Thought for the day: "Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good. "
It's scripture, and I learned it because my church taught me that it was good to "hide the word in my heart", as scripture teaches. I continue to be a Chris...tian, and could validly convert to Catholicism not so much because of the charisma of its own members, but because of the rich, profound way that believers over the centuries have strived (Striven?!?!?!) to incorporate scriptural principals into religious practices. I believe that the religious practices may be cultural in some instances, yes, but remain useful when they lead others to the truth of the Word of God. To reject outright the good which that leads others to is to deny others of the same opportunity of access to God's goodness, which, being infinite, no human will fully comprehend until the end of time.
It's scripture, and I learned it because my church taught me that it was good to "hide the word in my heart", as scripture teaches. I continue to be a Chris...tian, and could validly convert to Catholicism not so much because of the charisma of its own members, but because of the rich, profound way that believers over the centuries have strived (Striven?!?!?!) to incorporate scriptural principals into religious practices. I believe that the religious practices may be cultural in some instances, yes, but remain useful when they lead others to the truth of the Word of God. To reject outright the good which that leads others to is to deny others of the same opportunity of access to God's goodness, which, being infinite, no human will fully comprehend until the end of time.
Thank you Angela for your posts. May God continue to show you Love while giving you Wisdom. I guess that's my prayer for me and all of you as well.
Peace, Jon
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






